From Warren Buffett calling it “a growing menace” to pension funds pouring billions into it, private equity (PE) has become impossible to ignore. Major outlets from the Wall Street Journal to 60 Minutes are covering how this once-obscure corner of finance now controls everything from your local veterinary clinic to major hospital chains. Meanwhile, firms like Apollo and KKR are racing to offer investment solutions to individual investors like you, sensing a massive opportunity as investors search for something beyond the traditional 60/40 portfolios and new rules allowing for it in your 401k.
If you’re wondering whether the hype is justified – and more importantly, whether you should care – you’re asking the right questions at the right time.
The Great Ownership Shift
The headline: Companies aren’t just staying private longer – they’re staying private at sizes that would have been unthinkable a generation ago.
Consider these seismic shifts in how companies approach public markets:
- The missing middle: 86% of U.S. companies with revenues exceeding $100 million remain private
- The shrinking public market: The number of U.S. listed companies has plummeted from over 8,000 in 1996 to approximately 4,600 today
- The size explosion: The average IPO size has ballooned from around $50 million in the 1980s to over $250 million today
What’s driving this shift? Abundant private capital, the regulatory burden of being public, and the ability to achieve massive scale without IPO funding. When Uber raised billions while private, it shattered the old playbook that said “go public to grow big.” As small and mid-sized business owners look to sell, private equity buyers are increasingly at the table with offers that are hard to refuse.
The implications are staggering. Today, private equity-backed companies outnumber publicly traded ones by a ratio of 2.5x in the United States. Entire sectors – from healthcare to business services – are increasingly walled off from public investors.
Why Your 60/40 Portfolio Could Develop a Blind Spot
The headline: As public markets become increasingly concentrated, private equity offers exposure to the broader economy that index funds can’t match.
Here’s a sobering reality about today’s markets:
- The top 10 companies in the S&P 500 represent over 30% of the index’s value, up from 20% a decade ago – creating concentration risk.
- The number of mid-sized public companies continues to shrink.
Private equity offers a counterbalance, providing exposure to:
- The middle-market ecosystem driving U.S. employment and innovation
- Sectors underrepresented in public markets, like manufacturing and business services
- Companies at their prime growth phase – not after it
The Performance Debate: Cutting Through the Noise
The headline: Private equity has delivered superior returns, but the story is more nuanced than promoters suggest.
Over 20 years, private equity returned 14.5% annually versus 7.6% for global equities. A $100,000 investment would have grown to roughly $1.5 million in PE versus $432,000 in public markets. It also showed just one negative year over two decades.
But here’s what’s often missed:
The J-Curve Reality: Like planting an orchard – you spend early years investing before reaping returns. In years 1–3, returns often dip as fees and investments ramp up. By years 4–7, performance accelerates as companies are sold. This delayed payoff requires patient capital.
Performance Persistence: Top-quartile managers have historically repeated success, but results vary by “vintage year,” with downturns often yielding the best opportunities.
The Virtuous Leverage Factor Has Faded: Much of PE’s historic outperformance came during decades of cheap debt. With rising rates and leverage ratios falling from 6x EBITDA to ~5x, future returns will rely more on operational improvements than financial engineering.
The New Playbook: How PE Creates Value in a Higher-Rate World
The headline: As cheap debt disappears, value creation now depends on revenue growth, operational efficiency, and sector expertise.
The old PE model was simple: buy with borrowed money, improve modestly, sell higher. Between 2013–2023, 50% of buyout returns came from revenue growth and 50% from multiple expansion. As rates rise and capital floods in, that dynamic changes.
Future value creation will depend on:
- Sector Specialization: Narrow focus in healthcare, tech, or business services
- Buy-and-Build Strategies: Growth through acquisitions and market consolidation
- Digital Transformation: Using AI and data analytics to modernize traditional firms
- Talent Injection: Bringing in specialized executives and advisors to scale faster
The Access Revolution: Your Options Are Expanding (But Read the Fine Print)
The headline: New structures are democratizing access – but not all private equity is created equal.
Access options now include:
1. New Fund Structures (Interval & Tender Offer Funds)
- Minimums as low as $25,000
- Diversified portfolios with quarterly liquidity (typically 5–20%)
- “Evergreen” format keeps capital fully invested from day one
2. Secondary Markets
- Grown from $60B in 2007 to over $500B in assets today
- Allow discounted access to existing PE fund stakes
3. Co-Investment Opportunities
- Direct investments alongside PE funds
- Lower or no fees, but higher sophistication required
The Uncomfortable Truths: What Could Go Wrong?
The headline: Private equity faces headwinds that could compress returns.
- Dry Powder Problem: $1T+ in uninvested capital means fierce competition and higher valuations (12.2x EBITDA vs. 10x historical).
- Leverage Factor: Rising rates mean less debt-driven returns.
- Denominator Effect: Public market drops can force institutional selling.
- Fee Drag Reality: High fees require significant outperformance to justify.
- Liquidity Illusion: “Quarterly liquidity” may vanish in stress periods.
Your Decision Framework: Is Private Equity Right for You?
The headline: PE can make sense – but only with honest self-assessment.
Consider PE if you:
- Can commit capital for 5–7 years
- Want potentially higher long-term returns
- Understand the fee structure
- Have sufficient wealth to diversify by vintage year
Avoid it if you:
- Need liquidity within 5 years
- Dislike limited transparency
- Expect guaranteed outperformance
The Future of Private Equity: Three Predictions
- The Great Convergence: Returns will likely normalize closer to public markets +2–3%.
- The Specialization Imperative: Firms with true sector expertise will win.
- The Transparency Revolution: Investor demand will push for clearer reporting.
Your Next Move: From Analysis to Action
Private equity is becoming more accessible – but not universally appropriate. Understand your liquidity needs, start small (5–10% allocation), and favor experienced managers with proven track records.
PE can enhance diversification and long-term growth, but it comes with cost, complexity, and risk. In a world dominated by mega-cap public stocks, it offers unique access to the broader economy – for those who can afford patience and diligence.
Sources: Hamilton Lane & KKR investor materials.
To learn more about how Panoramic Capital Partners can help you evaluate private equity opportunities, visit our website or reach out to our team directly.
Panoramic Capital Partners (“Panoramic”) is a registered investment advisor.
The information provided is for educational, informational, and illustrative purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. Panoramic Capital Partners and its advisors do not provide legal, accounting, or tax advice. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.
The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This article may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon